Old Assessment Guidelines in Task 3 Module 4

[Schicksal]

Dear Ajarn Lugsamee,

Hope your family and friends in Japan are all well.
I do pray for Japan, too.

While doing task 3 I found that the assessment guidelines in the attached file in task 3 are not relevant to the peer's work from task 2.

Could you please help check?
Thank you for your support in advance

Best regards,

[lugsamee]

Hello K Schicksal,

Glad to talk to you again kha.

I do believe that the guidelines attached in T3 are related to T2. Remember? In T2 instruction box, each student is required to make comments on their peers’work (Ex3 in T1), using the criteria in the instruction sheet file. For. example, you could say if your friends’ sentences are well-organized or grammatically correct. And by so doing, you’re, to a certain degree, expressing your agreement or disagreement with your peers.

Then, in T3, you will evaluate if your peers’comments are informative & useful. For instance, does their feedback indicate if s/he agrees or disagree with your work?

Hopefully, my explanations will help clear up the air.
Thanks again kha:)
Aj Lugsamee

[Schicksal]

Dear Ajarn Lugsamee,

Thanks so much for your prompt reply and explanations.

Now it is clear that I need to refer to the criteria points 5-8 in the criteria guidelines (Task 1)to assess peers' feedback whether their comments are informative and useful for my written work in Exercise 3 according to those criteria.

It looks to me as if there were individual questions 5-8 in Exercise 3 which made me think the assessment guidelines were from the last semester.

Please accept my apology for my own confusion and misunderstanding.

Have a nice day

Best regards,

[lugsamee]

Konichiwa kha,

No problems at all kha. I’m so glad that you asked the questions kha. This really tells how you’ve learned through our tasks kha.

Keep up on your work na kha!